ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Practices and Challenges in Portuguese Early Childhood Intervention: A Descriptive Study.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesEarly Childhood Intervention (ECI) services are critical for supporting children with developmental needs and their families. Despite an established legislative framework, challenges related to accessibility, equity, resources, and standardization of practices persist. This study aimed to describe the perspectives of early intervention professionals in Portugal regarding current barriers, facilitators, and priority areas for improvement within the system.
methodsA descriptive study was conducted involving 82 professionals working in early intervention in Portugal. Data were collected using a survey specifically developed by the research team, grounded in a comprehensive literature review and professional expertise. The instrument was validated through a Delphi Panel with two rounds involving six experts in ECI. Data from open-ended questions were analyzed using content analysis, identifying categories and sub-categories to describe the responses, and descriptive statistics for the closed-ended questions.
resultsProfessionals highlighted the need to update the National ECI System (SNIPI), improve accessibility, and ensure equitable access to early intervention services. Participants reported limited resources, a lack of standardization in practices, and emphasized the importance of professional training and continuous professional development. The findings also pointed to the urgent need for investment and functional and structural restructuring of early intervention services. Various barriers and facilitators were identified.
conclusionsThe study provides valuable insights into the perspectives of early intervention professionals, identifying critical areas for policy improvement, resource allocation, and practice standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.