Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749602›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Regenerative Endodontic Treatment in Permanent Incisors: Two Case Reports with 6 Years of Follow-Up.

María Biedma-Perea, Marcela Arenas-González, María José Barra-Soto, Carolina Caleza-Jiménez, David Ribas-Pérez

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María Biedma-PereaDepartment of Stomatology, Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena SN, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-0145
Marcela Arenas-GonzálezDepartment of Stomatology, Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena SN, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-7187
María José Barra-SotoDepartment of Stomatology, Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena SN, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-7033
Carolina Caleza-JiménezDepartment of Stomatology, Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena SN, 41009 Seville, Spain.
David Ribas-PérezDepartment of Stomatology, Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena SN, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6123-9216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegenerative endodontic treatment (RET) has emerged as a biologically based alternative to traditional apexification for managing immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis. By promoting tissue ingrowth and continued root development, RET aims not only to eliminate infection but also to reinforce structurally compromised roots. Although its clinical use has expanded, evidence regarding the long-term predictability and durability of RET remains limited, as most published studies provide only short- or mid-term follow-up. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes two pediatric cases involving regenerative procedures performed on three immature permanent maxillary incisors, each followed for more than six years. The first case involved a 7-year-old girl who developed pulp necrosis in a maxillary lateral incisor after acute dental trauma. Management followed a regenerative protocol using triple antibiotic paste (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline) as intracanal medication and mineral trioxide aggregate as the coronal barrier. The second case concerned an 8-year-old girl presenting with chronic infection and sinus tracts affecting both maxillary central incisors. These teeth were treated using a regenerative approach with calcium hydroxide as the intracanal medicament and Biodentine as the sealing material. Clinical, radiographic, and cone beam computed tomography evaluations demonstrated complete symptom resolution and periapical healing but incomplete progressive apical closure. All treated teeth developed a calcified apical barrier, and outcomes remained stable throughout the extended follow-up period.

conclusionsWhile inherently limited by the nature of case reports, these findings support RET as a reliable and durable therapeutic option for necrotic immature permanent teeth, including cases in which conventional apexification has not been successful.

Indexed as

apexificationcase reportimmature teethregenerative endodontic

Identifiers

PMID41749602
PMCPMC12939366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.