ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pediatricians' Perspective on the Role of Stepparents in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesShared decision-making is a central principle in pediatric practice, yet its implementation becomes challenging in the context of alternative family configurations. Stepparents have substantial caregiving roles, but Belgian legislation does not include them in medical information or decision-making authority, creating a gap between legal frameworks and clinical realities. The objective of this study was to explore pediatricians' perspectives on the involvement of stepparents in medical information sharing and decision-making for minors, and to identify factors influencing whether and how stepparents are included.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using six semi-structured focus group interviews with 30 pediatricians from six hospitals across Flanders, Belgium. Participants were purposively sampled based on clinical experience. The interviews explored experiences with consent, confidentiality, and stepparent involvement in pediatric care. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using constant comparative analysis to identify overarching themes.
resultsThree overarching themes emerged. First, the medical context strongly shaped decisions: medical information and minor decision-making were frequently shared, while major decision-making often involved consultation with the legal guardian. Second, relational dynamics, including the quality of the stepparent-child relationship, co-parenting conflict, and physicians' intuitive assessments, influenced the extent to which stepparents were involved. Third, vulnerability was a recurring theme across all actors: physicians felt legally exposed, children risked fragmented care, legal guardians feared loss of control, and stepparents lacked recognition despite significant caregiving roles.
conclusionsThis study shows the importance of a better alignment between clinical practice and legal reality. Aligning legal frameworks with contemporary family patterns may support more consistent, child-centered decision-making in pediatric practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.