ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Psychological Impact of Congenital Chest Wall Deformities Among Adolescents and Young Adults.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital Chest Wall Deformities in Children: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mitral Valve Prolapse and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Evidence in Both Directions and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Compressive bracing for pectus carinatum following congenital heart disease surgery in children: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progression of pectus excavatum and carinatum coincides with adolescence, a critical period for identity and self-esteem development. While clinical decision-making and insurance coverage have historically emphasized anatomic severity and cardiopulmonary functioning, increasing evidence suggests that psychosocial burden and quality of life (QoL) impairment represent central components of disease impact. A narrative review was conducted using the PubMed database to synthesize the current literature on the psychological impact of these deformities in adolescents and young adults, including body image distress, social functioning, and mental health effects before and after surgical and non-surgical correction, focusing on validated tools and qualitative studies. Across multiple cohorts, adolescents and young adults with chest wall deformities consistently report impaired body image, reduced self-esteem, social avoidance, and diminished QoL, even in the absence of diagnosable psychiatric disorders. Surgical and non-surgical corrections have positive effects in these domains. Psychological burden, therefore, represents a clinically meaningful component of chest wall deformities and should be considered alongside anatomic and physiologic criteria. Current evidence advocates for the integration of standardized psychosocial screening and support into evaluation and follow-up, which is essential for providing comprehensive, patient-centered care. Greater recognition of psychosocial outcomes may inform advocacy for broader treatment criteria, increasing accessibility among affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.