ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Evaluation of an AI-Based Prototype for Contactless Respiratory Monitoring in Children.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Implementation in Maternal and Child Health: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric respiratory disorders frequently necessitate clinical evaluation, often during sleep. Traditional polysomnography (PSG), while the gold standard for sleep-related respiratory assessment, is resource-intensive and can cause discomfort, particularly in children. Therefore, in a prior published study, we designed and technically validated a video-based prototype for contactless monitoring of respiratory movements.
objectiveOur present study aimed to clinically validate the contactless monitoring prototype in pediatric patients, with a primary focus on detecting respiratory rate and identifying abnormal breathing patterns.
methodsTwenty-seven pediatric patients (aged 6 months to 12 years) were recruited from a pediatric sleep laboratory. To monitor thoracoabdominal movements in real time, the prototype employed a time-of-flight camera and a 3D imaging module, coupled with artificial-intelligence-based determination of the region of interest (ROI). Respiratory rates obtained from the prototype were compared to simultaneously recorded PSG data. Data were collected under various conditions, including different sleeping positions. A total of 296 h of respiratory data were acquired, of which selected 60 s segments (54 during N3 sleep and 27 during REM sleep) were analyzed using the prototype and compared with PSG-derived respiratory parameters.
conclusionThe contactless prototype demonstrates that reliable and non-invasive respiratory monitoring is feasible in pediatric patients. It enables accurate detection of respiratory rate as well as abnormal breathing patterns under routine clinical conditions, while reducing patient burden compared with conventional approaches. Its usability and minimal patient discomfort suggest potential for broader clinical adoption. Future work should focus on full-night recordings across all sleep stages and the development of automated data analysis pipelines to facilitate routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.