Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749587›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bronchoalveolar Results in Young Children with Chronic Lung Symptoms: Lessons Learned from an Allergy-Pulmonology Project Guided by an Updated Mini Review of the Current Literature of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Eosinophilia and Neutrophilia in Normal Children.

Russell J Hopp, Elizabeth A Eischeid, Steven Rose, Heather Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Russell J HoppDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3931-4237
Elizabeth A EischeidDepartment of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.
Steven RoseDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-0083-5945
Heather ThomasDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are valuable procedures, used by pediatric pulmonologists in a wide variety of clinical scenarios. Reports of indications for BAL include investigations of infectious processes, for unusual or poorly responsive pneumonia, and non-infections reasons, including interstitial lung disease and aspiration syndromes. BAL in pediatric asthma is occasionally done in severe and uncontrolled asthma, to rule out co-morbid conditions or to investigate asthma phenotypes. We report here the results of BAL in young children with global pre-BAL diagnoses, with comprehensive analysis of the BAL cellularity and culture results, and with a post hoc review by an allergist. The results of BAL in children with enigmatic pulmonary processes were compared to the expected BAL cellularity in normal children, obtained by an expanded historical mini review.

methodsThe initial objective was to perform a mini review of the collective published data for normal/control children with BAL differential cell counts with the purpose of using the results to compare normals to the information obtained on the symptomatic children with BAL results from pulmonologists in our combined allergy-pulmonary division. The exploratory study group was children 0-6 years of age who underwent a BAL from 2000 to 2024 at an academic pulmonary-allergy division. The children had presumptive diagnoses requiring investigation, including the most common diagnoses of asthma, chronic cough, aspiration, or refractory bronchitis, and in this post hoc protocol only the diagnoses provided on the pre- and/or post-operative summary by the divisional pulmonologist(s) performing the BAL were used in the post hoc analysis. Secondarily, the operative day pre- and/or post-lavage diagnoses were used to divide the children into groups (based on operative day diagnoses) to stratify their lavage results, based on eosinophils, neutrophils, culture positivity and lipid-laden macrophages. Normative data collected from the literature was used as the historically expected results for the BAL group(s) analysis.

resultsA mini review of BAL cellularity across 25+ years of literature was performed to establish normative data for our subsequent analysis. Both eosinophils and neutrophils are low or absent in normal children based on the comprehensive literature review. As a part of a larger cohort of 500 children ages 0-20 years, 317 children ages 0-6 were selected for review. The protocol was approved by the University Institutional Review Board. Using the mini review as reference, we found that eosinophil counts of one or more were recovered in over 20% of all children, regardless of bronchoscopy indication. Neutrophilia > 50% of cells and/or bacteria colony counts > 100,000 organisms were also frequent findings (>50 percent of the children). As a separate observation, lipid-laden macrophages did not isolate to aspiration indications for the bronchoscopy and lavage.

conclusionsAn updated mini review of the cellularity expected in control children provided a context to the findings in our studied exploratory sample population. There was a high recovery of neutrophils coupled with culture positivity found across all children undergoing BAL. Eosinophils > 1 were present in up to 25% with a pre-lavage asthmatic symptom indication, but almost an equal percentage in other children with non-asthma-like conditions was surprising. Lipid-laden macrophage data was unhelpful.

Indexed as

asthmabronchitisbronchoalveolar lavagecoughpediatric

Identifiers

PMID41749587
PMCPMC12939158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.