Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749570›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Participatory Methodologies for Addressing School Bullying: An Overview and Methodological Guidelines.

Manuel Montañés-Serrano, Iving Zelaya-Perdomo, Esteban A Ramos Muslera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel Montañés-SerranoDepartment of Sociology and Social Work, University of Valladolid, 40005 Segovia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3107-8818
Iving Zelaya-PerdomoInstitute for Research in the Humanities, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras.ORCID 0000-0002-7122-2992
Esteban A Ramos MusleraUniversity Institute for Democracy, Peace and Security, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-6731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullying is not a dyadic interaction between victim and perpetrator, but a relational phenomenon involving multiple group networks: those who exercise physical, psychological, or symbolic violence; those who encourage it; those who suffer it; and those who, while aware of it, remain on the sidelines. Preventing bullying, or stopping it once it emerges, requires undermining the support base that sustains it: no one should play the role of cheerleader, and those who remain passive must become involved in defending those targeted. It is also necessary to foster in those who are bullied the strength and capacity to confront the situation. From a Freirean perspective, this implies weaving alliances between those who are kindred and those who are different, and even with outsiders, to oppose those who act antagonistically. Such a task demands debate, reflection, and the collective formulation of measures among the diverse group realities in schools, given that bullying is grounded in the refusal to recognize certain others as part of "us", though we are all "others" to one another. This article sets out arguments for the need to address these diverse group realities and presents the phases and main contents of a participatory process for designing and implementing a School Coexistence Plan, drawing on the Participatory Construction of Peaceful Coexistence method as a framework for addressing bullying.

Indexed as

adolescencebullyingchildhoodidentitynetworksparticipatory methodologiespeacebuildingsociopraxis

Identifiers

PMID41749570
PMCPMC12939492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.