Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749498›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2026

Prenatal Psychosocial Distress Interacting with Postnatal Maternal Sensitivity in Shaping Infant Observed Affect and RSA Profiles.

Yu Chen, Esther M Leerkes, Andrew Supple, Savannah A Girod, Cheryl Buehler, Laurie Wideman, Lenka H Shriver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu ChenDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-3350
Esther M LeerkesDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew SuppleDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Savannah A GirodDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Cheryl BuehlerDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Laurie WidemanDepartment of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Lenka H ShriverDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Biopsychosocial predictors of obesity during the first 2 years of lifeR01HD093662 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI LEERKES, ESTHER M · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We (1) identified profiles of infant behavioral and physiological responses across the still-face paradigm, (2) examined differences in subsequent infant outcomes across profiles, and (3) examined the independent and interactive effects of prenatal maternal distress and early postnatal caregiving environments as predictors of infant profiles. Participants (N = 299, 52.5% non-Hispanic White; 48.8% female infants) reported a variety of prenatal distress indicators. Maternal sensitivity was observed when infants were 2 months, and infant positive and negative affect and respiratory sinus arrhythmia were assessed during the still-face at 6 months. Regulatory and problem behaviors were observed/reported at 1 and 2 years. Three latent profiles emerged: high negative affect, modest still-face effect, and strong still-face effect. Infants in the modest still-face effect profile demonstrated subsequent better emotion regulation and lower behavior problems, compared to the others, albeit at 1 year only. Infants with matched prenatal and postnatal environments (i.e., high prenatal distress, low maternal sensitivity) tended to be in the modest still-face effect profile, whereas those experiencing mismatched environments (i.e., high prenatal distress, high sensitivity) were more likely to be in other profiles. Results suggest the importance of considering the joint effects of prenatal and postnatal caregiving environments on infant regulatory and behavioral development.

Indexed as

AffectEmotional RegulationInfant BehaviorMaternal BehaviorMother-Child RelationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsProblem BehaviorPsychological DistressRespiratory Sinus ArrhythmiaStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansInfantMalePregnancyinfant affectinfant RSAlatent profilematernal sensitivityprenatal stressstill‐face

Identifiers

PMID41749498
PMCPMC12946596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.