ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Exploring Patient Experiences of Symptom Support From Healthcare Professionals in Acute and Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSymptoms are a central part of living with illness, and healthcare professionals play a crucial role in supporting patients in the managing of these. Symptom support is not only about alleviating physical discomfort but also about addressing the subjective and existential dimensions of illness. Understanding how patients experience such support is essential for strengthening communication, dignity, and person-centred care.
aimsThis study aims to explore the meaning of patients' experience of support from HCP in managing symptoms, and how this meaning shapes their understanding of symptoms and subsequent strategies.
methodsA qualitative design was applied. In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patients diagnosed with acute or chronic illness and receiving care in hospital and outpatient settings. Data were analysed using a phenomenological hermeneutic approach inspired by Ricoeur.
findingsThree themes were identified. Caught in the gaps of continuity in care describes how patients experienced symptom support as fragmented and inconsistent, shaped both by organisational structures and the professionals they encountered. Dialogue, relationship and professional knowledge as a vulnerable space highlights how encounters with healthcare professionals were perceived as fragile moments, where recognition, time, and competence could either foster trust or leave patients feeling exposed. Between silence and support in the healthcare encounter reflects how organisational structures and clinical routines often failed to address patients' concerns, creating silent spaces where symptoms and existential needs were overlooked.
conclusionsPatient experiences reveal how symptom support is shaped by both relational vulnerability and systemic fragmentation. When symptoms are overlooked, patients feel abandoned and burdened with coordinating their own care. Strengthening relational continuity, clarifying roles across professions explicitly to patients, and prioritising dialogue and empathy in clinical encounters are crucial steps toward ensuring person-centred symptom management that promotes dignity and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.