ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
A Computational Community Blind Challenge on Pan-Coronavirus Drug Discovery Data.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- TechBio 3.0 closes the drug discovery loop with multimodal AI and generative chemistry.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Physical priors improve performance of structure-based binding affinity models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bridging between Structure-Based and Data-Driven Affinity Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Linking biochemical and cellular efficacy of MERS coronavirus main protease inhibitors.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Linking biochemical and cellular efficacy of MERS coronavirus main protease inhibitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- LinkLlama: Enabling Large Language Model for Chemically Reasonable Linker Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Open Molecular Software Foundation (OMSF) and the Growing Role of Open Source Software in Molecular Modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Review
- Fingerprint-Based Machine Learning for SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoVJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Polaris Challenge: Data-Driven Priors to Improve Docking for Pose Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- TEMPL: A Template-Based Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction Baseline.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- How many crystal structures do you need to trust your docking results?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
126 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational blind challenges offer critical, unbiased opportunities to assess and accelerate scientific progress, as demonstrated by a breadth of breakthroughs over the past decade. We report the outcomes and key insights from an open science community blind challenge focused on computational methods in drug discovery, using lead optimization data from the AI-driven Structure-enabled Antiviral Platform Discovery Consortium's pan-coronavirus antiviral discovery program, in partnership with Polaris and the OpenADMET project. This collaborative initiative invited global participants from both academia and industry to develop and apply computational methods to predict the biochemical potency and crystallographic ligand poses of small molecules against key coronavirus targets, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) main protease (Mpro), as well as multiple ADMET assay end points, using previously undisclosed comprehensive experimental drug discovery data sets as benchmarks. By evaluating submissions across multiple tasks and compounds, we established performance leaderboards and conducted meta-analyses to assess methodological strengths, common pitfalls, and areas for improvement. This analysis provides a foundation for best practices in real-world machine learning evaluation, grounded in community-driven benchmarking. We also highlight how next-generation platforms, such as Polaris, enable rigorous challenge design, embedded evaluation frameworks, and broad community engagement. This paper reports the collective findings of the challenge, offering a high-level overview of the data, evaluation infrastructure, and top-performing strategies. We further provide context and support for the accompanying papers authored by the challenge participants in this special issue, which explore individual approaches in greater depth. Together, these contributions aim to advance reproducible, trustworthy, and high-impact computational methods in drug discovery, and to explore best practices and pitfalls in future blind challenge design and execution, including planned initiatives for the OpenADMET project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.