ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Empowering patients in family medicine research: a case-study of patient partner involvement in educational and knowledge translation activities.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Family doctors are encouraged to involve patients as equal partners in research and teaching, but examples of how to do this well are still quite rare. Our project, called the Canadian Primary Care Information Network - Learner and Patient partnership (CPIN-LEAP), set out to show what genuine partnership can look like when developing learning tools for family medicine residents.What we did. Two patient partners sat on the core research team from day one and helped write the successful grant application. Guided by two national engagement frameworks, we invited nine additional patients to co-design the project’s key products. Together, this team created an online learning module that walks residents through six essential communication skills, and they also drafted eye-catching posters and brochures that invite patients to send feedback after a clinic visit.What worked well. Patient partners said they felt respected, influential, and relevant. Their ideas made the resident module more practical, especially the real-life scenarios and plain-language tips, and ensured that the community posters spoke directly to patients’ concerns. The finished module has already been added to the University of Ottawa’s Department of Family Medicine’s Innovation Portal and clinic participants will be encouraged to display the posters and brochures.Challenges we faced. Recruiting enough French-speaking partners proved difficult in our predominantly English-speaking city, even after we specifically targeted Francophone community groups and social-media pages. Coordinating meeting times was another hurdle, because many partners juggled work, caregiving, or appointments; we solved this by mixing in-person workshops, short evening videoconferences with flexible email feedback.Why it matters. Working side by side with patients led to teaching and knowledge translation materials that reflect real-life worries and priorities. The process shows that deep partnership is doable, but only if projects budget for patient time and stay flexible with timelines. This case study illustrates practical processes and lessons learned from patient partner involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.