Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749396›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an online cancer bereavement group.

Lara King, Kirsten V Smith, Charles L Cole, Erin Hope Thompson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07002424 (A Protocol for a Pilot and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of an Online Cancer Bereavement Group.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07002424 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Protocol for a Pilot and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of an Online Cancer Bereavement Group.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsWaitlist Control, Intervention (Training) ConditionArmsTherapeutic - Psychological
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lara KingDivision of Psychology & Lang Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Research department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology (CEHP), University College London (UCL), London, UK. Lara.king.23@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3413-0906
Kirsten V SmithThe Loss Foundation, [Registered Charity 1147362], London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-2846
Charles L ColeDivision of Psychology & Lang Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Research department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology (CEHP), University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-751X
Erin Hope ThompsonThe Loss Foundation, [Registered Charity 1147362], London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe loss of a loved one to cancer brings unique difficulties that affect the bereavement experience. Mixed evidence exists for the effectiveness of in-person group interventions for bereaved caregivers, with barriers to accessing support including perceived stigmatisation and geographical constraints. Online bereavement interventions offer an accessible means of providing grief support at the individual and group level. Research supports the effectiveness of online groups for those bereaved by cancer although most existing studies have examined peer-led online groups only, while empirical evidence on therapist-led online groups is still limited. This paper describes the protocol for a pilot trial evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory effects of delivering online therapy groups for those bereaved by cancer.

methodsA longitudinal pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) design will be used. A total of 100 adults who have lost a loved one to cancer will be randomised to receive the intervention immediately or after a delay three months later. Participants will engage in an eight-session online therapeutic group over 12 weeks, integrating cognitive-behavioural therapy, compassion-focused therapy, and grief models. Primary outcomes are feasibility (recruitment, retention, adherence, and data completeness) and acceptability (session attendance and participant ratings of helpfulness). Secondary outcomes include changes in grief intensity, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, self-compassion, and social disconnection, measured at baseline, post-intervention, and three months post-intervention. Some measures such as depression, anxiety, grief intensity, and self-compassion will also be collected after each session. Feasibility and acceptability metrics will be assessed using pre-defined thresholds, and exploratory between-group differences in intervention outcomes will be examined. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial will evaluate whether a therapist-led online group intervention is feasible and acceptable for adults bereaved by cancer. It is hypothesised that participants will show improvements in psychological outcomes post-intervention compared to waitlist controls, with effects being maintained at follow up three months later. Our findings will help to inform the design of a future full-scale RCT to establish efficacy.

trial registrationFeasibility and Outcomes of Therapist-led Online Cancer Bereavement Groups (NCT07002424), ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 3 June 2025, retrospectively registered https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07002424 .

Indexed as

Cancer lossOnline bereavement groupsTherapist-led

Identifiers

PMID41749396
PMCPMC13059258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.