ArticleMovement ecology2026
Out of the forest: the movements and habitat selection of mixed-species bird flocks in agricultural landscapes adjacent to protected areas in Sri Lanka.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe conservation of tropical biodiversity will require not only protected areas, but also strategies to retain animals in degraded secondary forests and countryside agricultural landscapes. This study aims to identify key landscape elements and land-use types that support the movement of mixed-species bird flocks in areas outside, but adjacent to, rainforests in lowland Sri Lanka.
methodsWe recorded flock movement pathways at five sites using handheld GPS, and documented flock composition, land-use, and habitat variables at waypoints every 15 min. Land cover was assessed through high-resolution satellite images, and classified into land-use categories based on dominant vegetation. To analyze habitat selection, we employed a resource selection function using generalized linear mixed models.
resultsA total of 112 flocks were observed, yielding 754 location records (average 7 ± 3 [SD] points per flock) across ten 3-km transects over two years. Overall, a diverse array of species (n = 66) was recorded in flocks. An interaction between land-use and time of day affected flock habitat selection, with preference for water-associated habitat such as marsh and riparian corridors, and mixed cultivation, particularly high after morning, while tea plantations were generally avoided throughout the day. Flock speed was inversely related with land-use preference, and increased when the leading species Orange-Billed Babbler (Argya rufescens) was present. Flock size and species richness strongly declined with increasing distance to the forest, with the exception that marsh, riparian corridors and mixed cultivation retained large flocks.
conclusionsThe findings emphasize how mixed-species flocks can move through human modified landscapes and how their organization (e.g., leading species) influences that process. To sustain avian diversity in agroecosystems, conservation strategies must be spatiotemporally explicit. The study highlights the importance of planning heterogeneous landscapes, including water-associated habitat and mixed cultivations, in order for flocks to persist in this agricultural landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.