ArticleGenome medicine2026
A comprehensive framework for the interpretation of TTN missense variants.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MUC16 promotes endometrial cancer progression and modulates sensitivity to lapatinib through the ESR1/PI3K/AKT axis.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Spectrum and Clinical Interpretation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
60 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMissense variants in TTN pose a major challenge in genetic diagnostics due to their high frequency in the general population, the large size of the gene, and the complex multidomain architecture of the titin protein. While the contribution of truncating variants (TTNtv) to titinopathies is well established, the role of rare TTN missense variants remains poorly defined. Advances in computational prediction and functional testing offer new tools to assess their potential pathogenicity, which however are currently not fully utilized for clinical application.
methodsWe analyzed an international cohort of unsolved myopathy cases selected based on the presence of a rare missense variant in trans with a TTNtv. Clinical data were collected from neuromuscular centers worldwide. In silico predictions were generated using AlphaMissense and complemented by minor allele frequency (MAF) and exon usage information. Additional inclusion criteria were based on a MAF < 0.010 and an AlphaMissense score ≥ 0.792 for the missense variants, in accordance with the latest ClinGen guidelines. Selected missense variants were characterized in vitro through protein expression and cell imaging assays to assess their effects on domain solubility and aggregation.
resultsThirty patients with TTNtv/missense combinations were identified, presenting with heterogeneous myopathic phenotypes, ranging from congenital to adult onset. An in-depth analysis on AlphaMissense predictions highlighted those changes most frequently predicted as possibly pathogenic. Functional assays showed that three selected variants with changes to proline, located in β-sheets of Ig domains, led to impaired folding, cytoplasmic aggregation and co-localisation with proteostasis markers. In our cohort, all non-proline mutations occurred at buried sites, while some proline substitutions affected exposed residues. Notably, the variant p.(Gln7023Pro) was identified in 5 unrelated families sharing a conserved haplotype, indicating a common ancestor. This variant and the previously reported p.(Arg25480Pro) now meet ACMG criteria for classification as likely pathogenic.
conclusionsBy integrating clinical, computational, and functional evidence, we propose a framework for interpreting TTN missense variants. Combining multiple lines of evidence is essential for variants’ classification and interpretation, especially given TTN complexity. Advancing diagnostic accuracy will require tailored interpretation guidelines and a global effort in data sharing and functional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.