ArticleGenome biology2026
Translational buffering tunes gene expression in mice and humans.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ribo-ITP enables identification of translons from limited input samples.Nature communications · 2026Article
- FERONIA Modulates Translational Buffering Capacity of Ribosome-Associated Gene Module in Salt-Stressed Tomato Roots.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Translational buffering tunes gene expression in mice and humans.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranslational buffering refers to the regulation of ribosome occupancy to offset the effects of transcriptional variation. While previous studies have primarily investigated translational buffering in yeast under genetic variation or environmental stress, it remains unclear how widespread this is across mammalian genes in various cellular contexts.
resultsWe performed a uniform analysis of 1,515 matched ribosome profiling and RNA-seq datasets from humans and mice. This resource enabled us to assess translational buffering through comparative analysis of variation in ribosome occupancy and RNA expression, and by examining the relationship between mRNA abundance and translation efficiency. We found that translational buffering is partly conserved between humans and mice; homologous genes showed moderate cross-species correlation in mRNA-translation efficiency relationships and strong enrichment of shared buffered genes, particularly those encoding ribosomal, RNA-binding, and proteasomal proteins. Although identified buffered genes associate with specific sequence features, these alone are insufficient to predict translational buffering, highlighting the importance of cellular context. Genes exhibiting translational buffering show lower variation in protein abundance in cancer cell lines and tissues. We also observed that translationally buffered genes are more likely to be haploinsufficient and triplosensitive, suggesting a demand for stringent dosage limits.
conclusionsWe hypothesize two models of translational buffering, namely the "differential accessibility model" and the "translation initiation rate model", suggesting that different transcripts align with one or the other. Our study explores the translational buffering potential of genes across diverse conditions, elucidates their distinctive features, and provides insights into the mechanisms driving this effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.