Observational studyBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
Clinical pharmacist-led prevention of intravenous drug incompatibilities in an adult ICU: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients in intensive care units (ICU) usually need multiple intravenous drugs (IV) simultaneously and have a limited number of venous routes. This makes IV incompatibility an important problem in these units. The aims of this study were to identify the frequency of possible drug incompatibilities in the ICU and to prepare specific pharmaceutical guidelines for the unit to the prevent them.
methodsThis cross-sectional and prospective study was conducted in Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at Ankara University. Possible incompatibilities of IV drugs were assessed using the IBM Micromedex® and Stabilis 4.0 databases.
resultsThree hundred and thirty-eight drug request lists (DRL) of a total of 67 patients were included. At least one possible incompatibility was detected in 68.3% (95% CI: 63.3%–73.3%) of the drug request lists. First three drug groups that cause the most of incompatibilities belonged to the alimentary tract and metabolism, the anti-infectives for systemic use, systemic hormonal drugs and hormone regulators. The analysis of the type of IV drug administration showed that possible incompatibilities most commonly occurred between the continuously infused and bolus drugs (25%, n = 134/532). There was a moderate positive correlation between the number of anti-infective agents and possible incompatibilities (rho:0.41, p:0.001). Extreme drugs accounted for 40.6% (n = 432/1064) of the drugs that cause possible drug-drug incompatibilities. In terms of compatibility category, a poor degree of agreement was found between Micromedex and Stabilis (Cohen kappa = 0.174; 95% CI: 0.08–0.27; p < 0.001). Excluding “unknown” drug pairs slightly improved agreement between the databases (Cohen kappa increased from 0.174 to 0.293). A total of 567 recommendations were made during the study to prevent possible drug incompatibilities. All of which have been accepted and implemented. Of specific importance, all drug-solution incompatibilities were associated with anti-infective agents. A cross-table containing the Micromedex incompatibility data of the most frequently administered drugs with incompatibilities was prepared based on the data. There was no data for 33% (n = 438/1326) of the analyzed drug pairs in this cross-table.
conclusionsInterventions performed by clinical pharmacists contribute to preventing and reducing possible drug incompatibilities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.