ArticleBMC psychology2026
Behaviour patterns on social media and their associations with cognitive, social and emotional skills in university students.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch on digital behaviour has largely centred on aggregated screen-time metrics, which offer limited insight into how distinct patterns of engagement within social media environments relate to psychosocial competencies. Life skills—encompassing cognitive, social and emotional domains—are fundamental to adaptive functioning in young adults, yet the behavioural features of online interaction that align with these capacities remain insufficiently characterised.
methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out with 420 university students aged 18–25. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing instrumental, passive and reactive social media behaviours, alongside a validated measure of life skills. Analytical procedures included descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Reliability coefficients were estimated from the present sample, and model fit indices were examined to assess structural coherence.
resultsInstrumental engagement displayed small positive associations with cognitive and social life skills. Passive browsing and reactive interaction showed small negative associations with emotional and social skills. Although modest in magnitude, these associations displayed a stable configuration across the analytical models, suggesting that behavioural differentiation within social media use aligns with distinct life-skill profiles.
conclusionsThe study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of digital engagement by shifting the analytical focus from global usage frequency to behaviour-specific patterns. Instrumental, goal-directed use aligned with more adaptive skill configurations, whereas passive and reactive tendencies were associated with less favourable profiles. The cross-sectional design and the demographic composition of the sample constrain generalisability, underscoring the need for longitudinal and diverse population studies. The findings reinforce the relevance of intentional and reflective digital practices within university settings, where online interaction is embedded in daily life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.