Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026
Outcomes and prediction of mortality in patients requiring prolonged veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in the PRECISE-ECLS observational study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVeno-arterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO) as a bridge to recovery or long-term assist devices in severe cardiocirculatory failure typically lasts 5–7 days. There is scarce guidance on which patients benefit from prolonged support, as prediction models are based on parameters at the start of ECMO. We aimed to characterize the subgroup of patients still alive and on ECMO at day 7, and to develop a multivariable prediction model predicting one-year mortality in this subgroup.
methodsThis multicenter cohort study examines the characteristics and outcomes, including quality of life (QoL), of patients receiving short (1–7 days) and prolonged (> 7 days) V-A ECMO support. In patients still on ECMO at day 7 (the prolonged ECMO group), a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to predict one-year mortality. Model performance was evaluated using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC), Brier score and calibration plot, following internal validation performed via bootstrapping.
resultsOut of 546 patients, 160 (29%) underwent prolonged V-A ECMO support. These patients had lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV scores (mean 79 [SD 29] vs. 92 [SD 36]) and differed regarding ECMO indication. One-year mortality, (1-7days: 61%, >7days: 58%), and health related QoL at one year (1–7 days: Median EQ-5D index score [IQR] 0.82 [0.71, 0.91], > 7 days: 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]) were comparable between both groups. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting one-year mortality was constructed with age, APACHE IV, pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury during first week; and cumulative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and pulse pressure at day 7. The internally validated model showed moderate performance, with an AUROC of 0.68 and a Brier score of 0.22.
conclusionPatients with prolonged V-A ECMO differ in terms of indication and baseline risk scores. Mortality was not higher in patients who received ECMO support for longer than 7 days, and QoL at one year was good in both groups. Our developed multivariable prediction model showed moderate performance in predicting one-year mortality for those still on ECMO at day 7, and may help in multidisciplinary decision-making regarding continuation of ECMO support pending external validation.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 05444764; Registration date: June 22nd, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.