Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749286›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026

Outcomes and prediction of mortality in patients requiring prolonged veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in the PRECISE-ECLS observational study.

Jeroen J H Bunge, Lara C A Pladet, Kim Luijken, Myrthe P J Van Steenwijk, Atreyu Van Esch, Carlos V Elzo Kraemer, Jacinta J Maas, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Eric A Dubois, Kadir Caliskan and 8 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jeroen J H Bunge *Department of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.bunge@erasmusmc.nl.
Lara C A Pladet *Department of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kim LuijkenDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Myrthe P J Van SteenwijkDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Atreyu Van EschDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carlos V Elzo KraemerDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacinta J MaasDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dinis Dos Reis MirandaDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric A DuboisDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kadir CaliskanDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leon J MontenijDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Luuk C OtterspoorDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Erik ScholtenDepartment of Intensive Care, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Laurien Van KoppenhagenDepartment of Intensive Care, Isala hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Olaf L CremerDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederik GommersDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk W DonkerDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christiaan L MeuweseDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeno-arterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO) as a bridge to recovery or long-term assist devices in severe cardiocirculatory failure typically lasts 5–7 days. There is scarce guidance on which patients benefit from prolonged support, as prediction models are based on parameters at the start of ECMO. We aimed to characterize the subgroup of patients still alive and on ECMO at day 7, and to develop a multivariable prediction model predicting one-year mortality in this subgroup.

methodsThis multicenter cohort study examines the characteristics and outcomes, including quality of life (QoL), of patients receiving short (1–7 days) and prolonged (> 7 days) V-A ECMO support. In patients still on ECMO at day 7 (the prolonged ECMO group), a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to predict one-year mortality. Model performance was evaluated using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC), Brier score and calibration plot, following internal validation performed via bootstrapping.

resultsOut of 546 patients, 160 (29%) underwent prolonged V-A ECMO support. These patients had lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV scores (mean 79 [SD 29] vs. 92 [SD 36]) and differed regarding ECMO indication. One-year mortality, (1-7days: 61%, >7days: 58%), and health related QoL at one year (1–7 days: Median EQ-5D index score [IQR] 0.82 [0.71, 0.91], > 7 days: 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]) were comparable between both groups. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting one-year mortality was constructed with age, APACHE IV, pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury during first week; and cumulative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and pulse pressure at day 7. The internally validated model showed moderate performance, with an AUROC of 0.68 and a Brier score of 0.22.

conclusionPatients with prolonged V-A ECMO differ in terms of indication and baseline risk scores. Mortality was not higher in patients who received ECMO support for longer than 7 days, and QoL at one year was good in both groups. Our developed multivariable prediction model showed moderate performance in predicting one-year mortality for those still on ECMO at day 7, and may help in multidisciplinary decision-making regarding continuation of ECMO support pending external validation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 05444764; Registration date: June 22nd, 2022.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAgedAPACHECohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeROC CurveTime FactorsAcute heart failureCardiogenic shockExtra-corporeal membrane oxygenationMechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID41749286
PMCPMC13040854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.