SynthesisBMC veterinary research2026
Wild boar supply chain systems in Asia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The wild boar (Sus scrofa) supply chains contribute to the culture, economy, and food systems of several Asian countries. However, there is limited consolidated information on how wild boars are farmed, hunted, processed, distributed, and consumed in the region. This systematic review aimed to review the existing literature and information on wild boar supply chain systems in Asia, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Four major databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) were searched for peer-reviewed publications from January 1990 to December 2024 using keywords related to the wild boar supply chain systems. A total of 42 studies were included and analyzed across key supply chain domains. Most studies were from Vietnam (11, 26.2%), followed by Thailand and Japan (5, 11.9% each), Laos and Indonesia (4, 9.5% each), Cambodia and China (3, 7.1% each), the Philippines (2, 4.8%), and Malaysia, South Korea, Pakistan, Myanmar, and Nepal (1, 2.4% each). The review found that wild boar meat is mainly sourced through traditional hunting and small-scale farming, particularly in Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. Consumption is often linked to festivals and local traditions, particularly among rural and indigenous communities in Southeast Asia, including those in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Indonesia, and the Philippines. The supply chain comprises multiple actors, including hunters, farmers, traders, and consumers, and operates through both formal and informal trade networks. The cross-border movement of wild boar products has been observed in parts of Southeast Asia. The reviews highlight the need for further studies on mapping wild boar supply chains in high-risk areas and informal trade routes. Furthermore, governments and other stakeholders should improve disease surveillance, enforce biosecurity and wildlife trade regulations, and encourage cross-border collaboration to reduce zoonotic risks and ensure supply chain safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.