ArticleBMC health services research2026
Paediatric mental health liaison services in England: findings from a national survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPaediatric Mental Health Liaison (PMHL) in England is poorly understood with limited data on services previously collected.
aimTo describe the characteristics of PMHL services in England and create a service model typology.
methodData were collected using a cross-sectional online survey adapted from the questionnaire used by the existing adult-care-focussed Liaison Psychiatry Surveys of England (LPSE). The survey was distributed via email through professional networks and social media. Survey data were supplemented with direct correspondence with survey respondents. Responses were coded numerically and analysed descriptively using SPSS. Free-text responses were analysed using NVivo.
resultsResults were obtained from 28 services serving 47 hospitals. Three service models were identified; Type 1 services providing psychological care for children and young people (CYP) with long-term conditions (LTCs); Type 2 services providing care for CYP in crisis, and Type 3 services providing care for both groups. Few services provided 24/7 crisis care for all under-18s; many respondents reported this was provided by community child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) teams. Type 1 services were often constrained by condition-specific funding. Type 1 and Type 2 services lacked multidisciplinary staffing compared to Type 3 services.
conclusionsThis is the first survey of English PMHL service provision. Findings are exploratory, as they are based on a partial and non-representative sample of services. However, they suggest significant variation by hospital including a lack of dedicated 24/7 crisis care for all under-18s, and inequitable access to psychological support. Further research is required to replicate findings with a larger dataset, and to explore differences in service models. However, this preliminary data suggests that adequate PMHL provision would benefit from clearer national standards. Commissioning should ensure adequate funding and equity with adult provision. Terminology disagreements represent a research barrier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.