ArticleBMC health services research2026
Long-term services and supports assessments do not adequately address functional limitations associated with serious mental illness.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedicaid funded long-term services and supports (LTSS) can provide crucial wraparound supports to adults with serious mental illness (SMI) that have been shown to improve overall health, enhance quality of life, and promote longer tenure in home-and-community settings. In the United States, access to LTSS is determined by level-of-care (LOC) assessments, which are typically homegrown instruments that vary by state. Currently, it is unclear whether LOC assessments address functional limitations commonly experienced by adults with SMI.
methodTo examine this, we first identified publicly available LOC assessments nationwide with clearly defined scoring strategies. Second, we utilized the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scale (HoNOS), an evidence-based, functional assessment for adults with SMI, to comparatively analyze the extent to which state LOC assessments addressed functional limitations associated with SMI.
resultsAssessments from five states met our criteria: Hawai’i, Arizona, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee. Problems with activities of daily living (ADLs) were the primary driver of LTSS LOC scores and were substantially overrepresented compared to the HoNOS. Furthermore, eight of the 12 HoNOS functional limitation domains were either drastically underrepresented or not represented in any state assessment.
conclusionThis analysis suggests that LTSS LOC assessments do not adequately account for the full range of functional limitations commonly associated with SMI and may be systematically excluding high-need Medicaid recipients with SMI who do not have ADL challenges. To ensure parity for Medicaid recipients with SMI, we recommend state Medicaid programs consider implementing a uniform, evidence-based LOC assessment to determine LTSS eligibility for people with a primarily diagnosis of mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.