ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Virtual 3D landmark palpation in clubfoot: feasibility of an innovative standardized morphometric protocol. A preliminary study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable morphological assessment remains a clinical challenge in congenital clubfoot management, as current clinical scoring systems fail to capture the complex three-dimensional anatomy required for precise evaluation and treatment planning. Virtual palpation of anatomical landmarks offers a standardized, objective approach to define bony axes, but requires rigorous validation to become clinically applicable.
methods3D models (dried clubfoot and normal foot) were reconstructed from segmented CT scan datasets using image segmentation. For reproducibility purpose, thirty-two anatomical landmarks covering major tarsal bones were independently identified by three operators on three separate occasions using an in-house software lhpFusionBox (Laboratory of Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium). Key measurements are proposed to quantify foot bone orientations including root mean square errors (RMS), Bland-Altman plots, and stability indices assessed reproducibility. A complementary analysis evaluated clinical applicability through bony axis measurement and three-dimensional deformity quantification.
resultsIntra-operator reproducibility achieved mean RMS of 1.07 mm (90.6% < 2 mm) and inter-operator reproducibility of 1.28 mm (84.03% < 2 mm)-both within clinically acceptable thresholds. Mean biases were negligible (- 0.5 to + 0.5 mm) with narrow limits of agreement (± 6-7 mm). Distal lateral and dorsal landmarks demonstrated superior stability (< 0.6 mm). The protocol successfully identified clinically significant angular deviations between clubfoot and normal foot axes, demonstrating its utility for objective morphometric assessment and treatment monitoring.
conclusionThis standardized 3D landmark-based protocol achieves significative intra- and inter-observer reliability with proven geometric validity, meeting critical requirements for clinical adoption. It provides orthopedic clinicians with an objective, reproducible tool for clubfoot assessment, bridging the gap between subjective clinical evaluation and quantitative morphometric analysis. This advancement enables more precise treatment planning and standardized monitoring of deformity correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.