Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749193›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Virtual 3D landmark palpation in clubfoot: feasibility of an innovative standardized morphometric protocol. A preliminary study.

Athos Lubenga Ali Baba, Benoît Beyer, Fabian Moungondo, Guy-René Nday Ilunga, Willy Arung Kalau, Veronique Feipel, Greta Dereymaeker, Serge Van Sint Jan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Athos Lubenga Ali BabaFaculty of medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. athos.lubenga.ali.baba@ulb.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-4464
Benoît BeyerFaculty of medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Fabian MoungondoFaculty of medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Guy-René Nday IlungaDepartment of surgery, Universy of lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, DRC, Congo.
Willy Arung KalauDepartment of surgery, Universy of lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, DRC, Congo.
Veronique FeipelFaculty of medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Greta DereymaekerDepartment of biomechanics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Serge Van Sint JanFaculty of medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable morphological assessment remains a clinical challenge in congenital clubfoot management, as current clinical scoring systems fail to capture the complex three-dimensional anatomy required for precise evaluation and treatment planning. Virtual palpation of anatomical landmarks offers a standardized, objective approach to define bony axes, but requires rigorous validation to become clinically applicable.

methods3D models (dried clubfoot and normal foot) were reconstructed from segmented CT scan datasets using image segmentation. For reproducibility purpose, thirty-two anatomical landmarks covering major tarsal bones were independently identified by three operators on three separate occasions using an in-house software lhpFusionBox (Laboratory of Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium). Key measurements are proposed to quantify foot bone orientations including root mean square errors (RMS), Bland-Altman plots, and stability indices assessed reproducibility. A complementary analysis evaluated clinical applicability through bony axis measurement and three-dimensional deformity quantification.

resultsIntra-operator reproducibility achieved mean RMS of 1.07 mm (90.6% < 2 mm) and inter-operator reproducibility of 1.28 mm (84.03% < 2 mm)-both within clinically acceptable thresholds. Mean biases were negligible (- 0.5 to + 0.5 mm) with narrow limits of agreement (± 6-7 mm). Distal lateral and dorsal landmarks demonstrated superior stability (< 0.6 mm). The protocol successfully identified clinically significant angular deviations between clubfoot and normal foot axes, demonstrating its utility for objective morphometric assessment and treatment monitoring.

conclusionThis standardized 3D landmark-based protocol achieves significative intra- and inter-observer reliability with proven geometric validity, meeting critical requirements for clinical adoption. It provides orthopedic clinicians with an objective, reproducible tool for clubfoot assessment, bridging the gap between subjective clinical evaluation and quantitative morphometric analysis. This advancement enables more precise treatment planning and standardized monitoring of deformity correction.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksClubfootImaging, Three-DimensionalPalpationTomography, X-Ray ComputedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of Results3D landmarkClubfootReproducibilitySurgical planningVirtual palpation

Identifiers

PMID41749193
PMCPMC13041214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.