ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Development, validation, and biomechanical evaluation of a high-fidelity finite element model of the forearm musculoskeletal system.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Surface Indentation Assessment of an MRI-Based Subject-Specific Hand-Forearm Finite Element Model: A Preliminary Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe human forearm, a dynamically coordinated system of bones, muscles, and connective tissues, is central to upper limb function but poses significant challenges for computational modeling due to its anatomical complexity. Existing finite element (FE) models of the forearm often oversimplify soft tissues or lack rigorous validation, limiting their clinical utility. This study aimed to develop and validate a high-fidelity 3D FE model of the forearm musculoskeletal system to replicate in vivo stress distribution under axial loading.
methodsThe model was constructed using CT and MRI data from a fresh-frozen cadaveric specimen (MorphoSource) and validated with embalmed specimen, combined with anatomical references. Bone, muscle, ligaments, tendons, and cartilage geometries were segmented and optimized using Mimics 19.0, Geomagic Wrap 2017, and SolidWorks 2021. Material properties (isotropic, linear elastic) were assigned based on literature, and mesh convergence was validated. Mechanical validation included mesh convergence testing, geometric comparison with cadaveric measurements and literature data, and axial compression tests (100 N) to simulate physiological loading.
resultsA 3D FE model with 672,411 elements and 1,080,964 nodes was successfully built, reconstructing bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, and cartilage. Mesh convergence testing showed stress differences < 5%. FE model’s muscle belly length matched cadaveric measurements and literature values. Under 100 N axial load, the model predicted peak contact stresses of 4.8 MPa (radioscaphoid) and 2.75 MPa (radiolunate), with a 22.5% contact area, consistent with cadaveric experiments (5.13 MPa, 23.11%) and prior literature (5.24 MPa, 20.1–20.6%).
conclusionsThis high-fidelity FE model accurately replicates forearm anatomy and in vivo stress distribution, validated against cadaveric and literature data. It provides a robust platform for exploring forearm biomechanics and guiding clinical applications (e.g., surgical planning, implant design). Limitations include dynamic material properties and single-specimen validation, which warrant future studies with dynamic parameters and multi-specimen data. This framework advances translational biomechanics by bridging computational precision with anatomical realism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.