Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749188›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Development, validation, and biomechanical evaluation of a high-fidelity finite element model of the forearm musculoskeletal system​.

Ru-Guo Shang, Si-Yuan Xie, Li-Qing Liao, Guo-Zhong Qin, Xin-Yu Zhu, Zhong-Hao Wang, Jun-Hui Xie, Yi-Kai Li, Han Yang, Rui-Bin Gu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ru-Guo Shang *Guangzhou Orthopedics Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Si-Yuan Xie *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Li-Qing Liao *School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Guo-Zhong Qin *Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic Hospital (Shenzhen Pingshan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xin-Yu ZhuJingzhou Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Zhong-Hao WangJingzhou Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Jun-Hui XieShenzhen Pingle Orthopedic Hospital (Shenzhen Pingshan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. xiejunhuiok@126.com.
Yi-Kai LiSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. ortho@smu.edu.cn.
Han YangGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. yanghan1213@163.com.
Rui-Bin GuThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 18638390185@163.com.

Funding

President Foundation of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (YP202210)Project for the Construction of Li Yikai's Guangdong Provincial Master TCM Practitioner Inheritance Studio [(2023) No. 108]Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (No. SZZYSM202108013)Supported by the project of the Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission ([2023] No. 1198)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human forearm, a dynamically coordinated system of bones, muscles, and connective tissues, is central to upper limb function but poses significant challenges for computational modeling due to its anatomical complexity. Existing finite element (FE) models of the forearm often oversimplify soft tissues or lack rigorous validation, limiting their clinical utility. This study aimed to develop and validate a high-fidelity 3D FE model of the forearm musculoskeletal system to replicate in vivo stress distribution under axial loading.

methodsThe model was constructed using CT and MRI data from a fresh-frozen cadaveric specimen (MorphoSource) and validated with embalmed specimen, combined with anatomical references. Bone, muscle, ligaments, tendons, and cartilage geometries were segmented and optimized using Mimics 19.0, Geomagic Wrap 2017, and SolidWorks 2021. Material properties (isotropic, linear elastic) were assigned based on literature, and mesh convergence was validated. Mechanical validation included mesh convergence testing, geometric comparison with cadaveric measurements and literature data, and axial compression tests (100 N) to simulate physiological loading.

resultsA 3D FE model with 672,411 elements and 1,080,964 nodes was successfully built, reconstructing bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, and cartilage. Mesh convergence testing showed stress differences < 5%. FE model’s muscle belly length matched cadaveric measurements and literature values. Under 100 N axial load, the model predicted peak contact stresses of 4.8 MPa (radioscaphoid) and 2.75 MPa (radiolunate), with a 22.5% contact area, consistent with cadaveric experiments (5.13 MPa, 23.11%) and prior literature (5.24 MPa, 20.1–20.6%).

conclusionsThis high-fidelity FE model accurately replicates forearm anatomy and in vivo stress distribution, validated against cadaveric and literature data. It provides a robust platform for exploring forearm biomechanics and guiding clinical applications (e.g., surgical planning, implant design). Limitations include dynamic material properties and single-specimen validation, which warrant future studies with dynamic parameters and multi-specimen data. This framework advances translational biomechanics by bridging computational precision with anatomical realism.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisForearmMusculoskeletal SystemBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, AnatomicStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomechanicsFinite element modelForearm

Identifiers

PMID41749188
PMCPMC13001280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.