Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749183›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Empathy among male and female nurses in India: an analytical cross-sectional study.

Suresh Kumar Sharma, Nipin Kalal, Priya Sharma, Spraha Singh, Saroj Choudhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suresh Kumar SharmaCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-8865
Nipin KalalCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. kalaln@aiimsjodhpur.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-1787
Priya SharmaTutor College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Spraha SinghAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Saroj ChoudharyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpathy is crucial for delivering patient-centred nursing care, involving understanding, and sharing the feelings of others. It is fundamental for effective nurse-patient communication and its positive outcomes. This study aims to assess and compare empathy levels among male and female nurses in India.

methodsA cross-sectional design was employed, involving 428 registered nursing officers from India. The primary data collection instrument was the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Profession (JSE-HP) version, and a structured questionnaire was used to collect demographic information. Independent samples t-tests compared empathy scores between genders, and multiple linear regression identified factors associated with empathy levels.

resultsNo significant difference was found in total empathy scores between male (M = 106.29, SD = 18.35) and female nurses (M = 104.20, SD = 18.96) (p = 0.25). Regression analysis revealed that educational qualification significantly influenced empathy levels (B = -0.126, p = 0.034), with higher qualifications associated with lower empathy.

conclusionEmpathy levels are similar between male and female nurses, with a notable difference in the Compassionate Care domain. Incorporating continuous empathy training, enhancing self-esteem, and promoting cultural competence are critical steps to ensure that nurses develop and maintain high levels of empathy throughout their careers. Addressing these aspects in nursing curricula will ultimately lead to better patient care and improved healthcare outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

EmpathyGender differencesIndiaJefferson scale of empathyNursing

Identifiers

PMID41749183
PMCPMC13040724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.