ReviewBMC geriatrics2026
How do nature-based interventions increase the resilience of older persons? A best fit framework synthesis.
Review in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNature-based interventions (NBIs) are currently gaining popularity as a non-medical approach in health promotion. Resilience is a logical target for this type of interventions aimed at older adults. While several recent frameworks describe resilience processes in older individuals, and others explain how nature-based interventions influence resilience in the general population, a framework addressing how nature-based interventions impact resilience specifically in older adults is, to our knowledge, still lacking. Furthermore, existing models give limited attention to contextual factors, the interaction between components and pathways, and the role of social processes.
methodsIn this review, we present a framework that illustrates how components of nature-based interventions interact and influence the resilience process in older adults. We used a best-fit framework synthesis approach, initially constructing an a priori model based on existing frameworks and refining it using evidence from a systematic review of primary research (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science).
resultsOur refined framework identifies four key considerations for designing and evaluating NBIs for older adults. First, it is essential to address the specific needs of older individuals when developing nature-based interventions. Second, although nature-based interventions often share similar components, their design creates varying contexts that influence outcomes. Third, positive affect and social processes act as central elements within the web of causal pathways. Fourth, effective facilitation and tailoring are crucial for optimizing intervention outcomes.
conclusionNature-based interventions hold significant potential as health promotion strategies to enhance resilience in older adults. However, their design must carefully consider the interplay between intervention components and contextual factors, as these interactions can lead to different outcomes for different individuals. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.