ArticleBMC cancer2026
Tumor-Infiltrating lymphocyte dynamics as biomarkers of neoadjuvant treatment response in luminal breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are established immune biomarkers in breast cancer; however, their clinical relevance in hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) disease remains controversial. In particular, the predictive value of TIL dynamics for pathological response and their prognostic significance for survival outcomes are not clearly defined in this subtype.
methodsThis retrospective study included 87 patients with HR+/HER2 − breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2017 and 2025. Stromal TILs were assessed in pre-treatment core biopsy specimens and post-treatment surgical samples according to International TILs Working Group recommendations. Delta-TIL was calculated as the change between post-treatment and pre-treatment TIL levels. Associations between TIL parameters and pathological complete response (pCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using non-parametric tests, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression models.
resultsMedian pre-treatment TIL was 15%, which significantly decreased to 10% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). Patients who achieved pCR had significantly higher baseline TIL levels compared with those without pCR (30% vs. 15%, p = 0.027) and markedly lower post-treatment TIL levels (0% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Delta-TIL showed a strong association with pCR, with greater reductions observed in patients achieving pCR (–32.6% vs. − 3.0%, p < 0.001). Patients who achieved pCR demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared with those without pCR. In contrast, neither baseline TIL, post-treatment TIL, nor delta-TIL independently predicted PFS. Progression risk was primarily associated with pathological tumor burden and surgical factors.
conclusionBaseline TIL levels and chemotherapy-induced reductions in TILs are strongly associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HR+/HER2 − breast cancer.Although TIL dynamics may serve as a surrogate marker of treatment efficacy, they have limited value for long-term outcomes in this subtype.Larger, well-designed prospective studies are required to further clarify this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.