ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
BDDN: bayesian dynamic differential network analysis in cancer proteomics.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCancer progression and treatment responses are governed by intricate and dynamic molecular interactions. Although differential network analysis offers considerable potential for identifying condition-specific changes in protein-protein interactions, existing methods primarily rely on static comparisons between groups and do not adequately model underlying biological dynamics. This limitation restricts the ability to detect gradual and complex molecular responses to therapeutic interventions.
resultsWe propose a Bayesian dynamic differential network model to infer time-resolved changes in protein-protein interactions. Applied to cancer proteomics data, our approach captures gradual shifts in differential protein-protein interactions between experimental groups that standard group-based approaches fail to detect. The inferred differential networks reveal protein pairs with time-varying interaction patterns between groups, highlighting critical changes associated with drug response. Subsequent analyses, including functional clustering and hub identification, uncover distinct trajectories among differential edges and pinpoint key proteins that mediate pivotal transitions in the dynamic structure of the differential networks.
conclusionsThe proposed Bayesian dynamic differential network model successfully characterizes temporal variations in protein–protein interactions following drug intervention. The method uncovers time-dependent interaction patterns that differ between experimental groups, providing enhanced insights into drug-induced molecular mechanisms. This framework facilitates the identification of critical regulatory proteins and demonstrates broad applicability across diverse time-course omics investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.