Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749016›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026

Half-dose ticagrelor versus clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy in flow diverter-treated intracranial aneurysms: analysis of platelet reactivity and perioperative safety outcomes.

Can Li, Hao Yuan, Chuanzhi Duan, Xin Feng, Wenchao Liu, Jiwan Huang, Chi Huang, Mengshi Huang, Zhuohua Wen, Runze Ge and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Can LiNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao YuanNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuanzhi DuanNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. doctor_duanzj@163.com.
Xin FengNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenchao LiuNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiwan HuangNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chi HuangNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mengshi HuangNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuohua WenNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Runze GeNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiancheng LinNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fa JinNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ran LiNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shenquan GuoNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chengwei ChenNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuyin LiangNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xifeng LiNeurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. nflxf@126.com.

Funding

Foundation of National Heath Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center 82271297the Foundation of National Heath Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center GWJJ2022100102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety and efficacy of half-dose ticagrelor (45 mg twice daily) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for flow diverter (FD) treatment of intracranial aneurysm (IA), particularly in Chinese patients and with PED (Pipeline embolization device) Flex Shield, remains uncertain. This study assessed whether this regimen maintains efficacy while improving safety, including its applicability to PED Flex Shield.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study analyzed consecutive IA patients undergoing FD treatment between 2019-2024, comparing standard-dose clopidogrel (75 mg daily) plus aspirin (100 mg daily) with half-dose ticagrelor (45 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg daily). Outcomes included adenosine diphosphate-induced maximal platelet aggregation (ADPi-MPA) measured by light transmittance aggregometry, perioperative complications within 30 days post-procedure, and analysis of factors influencing ADPi-MPA levels.

resultsThe study included 405 IA patients (half-dose ticagrelor = 224, standard-dose clopidogrel = 181). The half-dose ticagrelor group demonstrated significantly lower ADPi-MPA (26.00 [17.45, 34.25] vs 37.70 [29.50, 43.60], P < 0.001), with comparable ischemic (3.1% vs 5.5%, P = 0.114) and hemorrhagic (2.1% vs 1.2%, P = 0.689) event rates. No significant differences in perioperative complications were found between FD types (PED/PED Flex/TED vs PED Flex Shield) when using the half-dose ticagrelor regimen (all P > 0.05). Similarly, complication rates were comparable between the two DAPT regimens across both FD subgroups (all P > 0.05).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that half-dose ticagrelor DAPT achieves significantly lower platelet reactivity (ADPi-MPA) compared to standard-dose clopidogrel, with no statistically significant differences in ischemic or hemorrhagic complication rates observed among FD-treated IA patients. Importantly, the half-dose regimen shows consistent performance across different FD devices (including PED Flex Shield) without compromising perioperative safety.

Indexed as

ClopidogrelIntracranial AneurysmPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorAdultAgedAspirinDrug Therapy, CombinationDual Anti-Platelet TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet AggregationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAspirinClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorDual antiplatelet therapyFlow diverterHalf-dose ticagrelorIntracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID41749016
PMCPMC12948863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.