SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Mnemonic benefits of state curiosity-A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
State curiosity is positively associated with enhanced recall of task-specific information as well as incidental information. The current meta-analysis has integrated data from 47 independent studies using a multilevel random effects model to investigate the relationship between state curiosity and recall of task-specific and incidental information. The results show a moderate effect (g = 0.44) of high curiosity states on the recall of task-specific information and a small effect (g = 0.13) on the recall of incidental information. This effect is not moderated by factors such as schedule of recall, type of state curiosity, age groups, and duration of exposure to information. The meta-analysis results align with the following three hypotheses in curiosity research: a) state curiosity improves learning outcomes as a function of reward-based learning and recursive feedback loops shaped by prior knowledge, personal interest, and expectations of learning progress; b) state curiosity facilitates encoding and long-term consolidation of information; and c) state curiosity influences attentional and dopaminergic processes that may support incidental learning. This meta-analysis is the first to offer an integrative evaluation of age groups in the context of state curiosity and information recall. Additionally, it provides evidence that high curiosity state is associated with enhanced recall for delayed recall conditions. The findings of this article have implications in developing interventions for memory impairment, improving curiosity-based learning outcomes, and in priming students to increase learning in intrinsically motivated school environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41748968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.