ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Racial/ethnic and sex disparities in mortality among US cancer survivors.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgrondCancer survivors in the United States face significant disparities in mortality influenced by race and sex. Despite advances in cancer treatment, the disparities of social determinants, behavioral health, and metabolic risk factors remain underexplored.
methodsAnalysis was based on the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) linked to the National Death Index and the follow-up data up to December 31, 2019. Survey-weighted multiple Cox regression was employed to assess the relationships of multiple risk factors and all-cause mortality. Analyses were informed by a conceptual causal framework (Directed Acyclic Graph). We performed an explanatory decomposition analysis to quantify the collective explanatory role of social determinants of health (SDoH) in the observed racial disparity.
resultsDuring median follow-up of 8.5 years, 2269 cancer survivors out of 6028 participants experienced all-cause mortality. In weighted analyses, we observed Black survivors had highest mortality rates (32.4%), followed by White (26.8%). Before covariables adjustment, Black had a higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.59) compared to the Whites. After adjustment of all covariables, there was no significant difference in mortality. Female cancer survivors had lower mortality rate (21.7%) and lower hazard ratio (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81). The analysis identified independent risk factors for increased mortality, including unemployment, lower family income, lack of private health insurance, current smoking, poor diet, physical inactivity, suboptimal sleep, hypertension, and diabetes. Central obesity was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.86), a finding that requires cautious interpretation due to potential reverse causation and confounding. Exploratory decomposition analysis suggested SDoH collectively explained a substantial portion of the unadjusted Black-White mortality difference.
conclusionIn this mixed population of cancer survivors, a higher burden of social and behavioral risk factors was associated with increased mortality. The findings underscore the critical need to integrate SDoH assessment and mitigation into long-term survivorship care to address social determinants and health behaviors to promote equity in survivorship outcomes. Future research with detailed clinical data is needed to disentangle the effects of cancer type and stage from post-diagnostic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.