ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Management of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: conservative or radical approach?
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe timing and approach to the management of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia (CFD) remains controversial in literature. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyse the management of CFD and correlate treatment methods with post-operative outcomes.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all histologically confirmed CFD over an 18-year period. Patient demographics along with symptoms and site of each lesion were recorded. Treatment modalities were correlated with recurrences or aggressive exacerbation. Chi-squared and Fishers’ exact tests were used to determine associations between different variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsForty-five patients were included with a mean age of 25.2 years and a male to female ratio of 1:1.8. Majority of patients (n:38) were symptomatic while the maxilla was the most affected site. Two patients had polyostotic involvement. Most patients were treated surgically (n:27) while asymptomatic cases were monitored (n:15). Bone recontouring was performed in 22 patients while five patients underwent resection. Three patients experienced progression/reactivation following recontouring and needed further intervention. No recurrences occurred in the resection group. Active disease process was the only statically significant factor that led to delay in surgical treatment (p = 0.001).
conclusionRecontouring should be considered for extensive CFD with functional impairment and facial asymmetry. Radical surgery should be reserved for lesions confined to a solitary region that display significant symptoms and rapid growth. The decision to surgically intervene and which surgical methods to utilize should be based on the patient’s age, symptoms, disease activity, facial regions involved and patient preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41748964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.