Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748944›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Safety profile of fentanyl with different routes of administration: a disproportionality analysis using the EudraVigilance database.

Raffaella Di Napoli, Annamaria Mascolo, Nunzia Balzano, Alessia Zinzi, Maria Maddalena Nicoletti, Annalisa Capuano, Francesca Gargano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raffaella Di NapoliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, - Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Annamaria MascoloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, - Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Nunzia BalzanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, - Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy. nunzia.balzano@unicampania.it.
Alessia ZinziDepartment of Experimental Medicine, - Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Maria Maddalena NicolettiDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Annalisa CapuanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, - Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Costantinopoli 16, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Francesca GarganoUnit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fentanyl is associated with significant respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to describe the safety of fentanyl administered through different routes of administration, with a focus on brain lesions. Safety data related to fentanyl were extracted from the EudraVigilance database up to March 7, 2024. Descriptive and disproportionality analyses were performed. A total of 6,441 cases were classifiable for the administration route. The transdermal route (80.9%) was the most reported route. Most cases were from adults and females. Overall, 92.8% of AEs were serious. The intravenous route had a higher disproportionate reporting of "nervous system disorders" than transdermal (ROR 1.31; [95% CI, 1.12-1.41]) and oral transmucosal (1.30; [1.12-1.49]). Among central nervous system disorders, 50 brain lesions were identified, with no statistically significant difference observed. Nasal administration had a higher reporting frequency of "central nervous system vascular disorders" compared to transdermal (2.45; [1.14-5.24]), intravenous (2.53; [1.09-5.87]), and oral transmucosal routes (4.89; [1.54-15.51]). On the other hand, the intravenous had a higher disproportionate reporting of "seizures" compared to nasal (3.19; [1.17-8.69]), oral transmucosal (2.09; [1.31-3.32]), and transdermal routes (2.41; [1.96-2.96]). The study provides a comprehensive safety profile of fentanyl across different administration routes, highlighting a higher disproportionate reporting of central neurologic and cardiovascular AEs with nasal and intravenous routes.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidFentanylAdministration, OralAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacovigilanceAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylAdverse eventsDisproportionality analysisFentanylOpioidPainPharmacovigilanceSafety

Identifiers

PMID41748944
PMCPMC13269385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.