ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Clinical and molecular characteristics of Class II and III BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic landscape and clinical characteristics of ERBB2/HER2-mutated colorectal cancers.The oncologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Class II and III BRAF mutations are uncommon events, with limited data on their clinical and biological characteristics. We investigated clinical and molecular features of BRAF mutation classes in a total of 24,402 patients with mismatch repair proficient CRC (MMRp). Samples collected between 2006 and 2023 were profiled using next-generation sequencing and whole-transcriptome sequencing. We identified 1268 (5.2%), 132 (0.54%), and 323 (1.3%) patients with class I, II, and III BRAF-mutated CRC. Patients with class III mutations had significantly better median overall survival (OS) than those with class I mutations (23.6 vs 17.4 months; HR = 1.26, CI: 1.08-1.47, p = 0.004). Transcriptomic analyses revealed that the MAPK pathway score was significantly lower for class II and III BRAF mutations without concurrent RAS mutations than for those with RAS co-mutations. The cetuximab score, an RNA expression-based predictor of EGFR therapy response, was significantly better for class II and III BRAF mutations than for class I. The cetuximab score significantly improved for only class III BRAF mutations when those with concurrent RAS mutations were excluded. The results of this large multi-institutional analysis of BRAF mutation classes reveal the prognostic value of class II and III BRAF mutations, and their distinct clinical and molecular features.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.