Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748928›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Promoting genetic and genomic practices among allied healthcare professionals and nurses: a systematic review.

Tharushini Anandam, Sanne Peters, Mariana Lauretta, Angela Morgan, Stephanie Best

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coding or non-coding? The question behind sequencing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tharushini AnandamMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sanne PetersMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mariana LaurettaTranslational Centre for Speech Disorders, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-3455
Angela Morgan *Translational Centre for Speech Disorders, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-7405
Stephanie Best *Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. stephanie.best@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1107-8976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic practices are increasingly recognised as essential components of modern healthcare. Allied health professionals and nurses are ideally placed to initiate discussions about genetic investigations with patients and families. However, there are known barriers such as a lack of confidence and knowledge. A key step to addressing these barriers is identifying implementation strategies that support the integration of genetics across healthcare disciplines. We conducted a systematic review to identify empirical and conceptual implementation strategies to support genetic practices among allied health professionals and nurses. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from 2020. Twenty-eight full-text articles were included in the review. Identified implementation strategies were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify key areas for behaviour change. Empirical strategies, including workshops, online learning, case-based education, and leadership development, demonstrated positive effects on supporting genetic integration into clinical practice. Conceptual strategies identified included: (1) education/learning, (2) professional development, (3) policy, (4) evaluation tools, and (5) educational resources. The TDF domains of Knowledge, Social Influences, and Social/Professional Role and Identity were commonly found, while the TDF domains of Intentions, Reinforcement, Optimism, Emotion and Goals were underrepresented. Findings demonstrate that empirical and conceptual implementation strategies lack evaluation and tend to focus solely on commonly targeted domains. Future research is needed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of implementation strategies, explore the underrepresented domains, and support efforts to increase genetic literacy and practices among allied health professionals and nurses.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelGenetic TestingGenomicsNursesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41748928
PMCPMC13171888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.