ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Mainstreaming genomic testing for mitochondrial disease in Australia.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Primary Mitochondrial Diseases: Diagnosis, Natural History Studies and Clinical Trials.Genes · 2026Review
- Coding or non-coding? The question behind sequencing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic sequencing has transformed the diagnostic approach for mitochondrial disease, yet integration into standard clinical practice is limited by access and funding. We conducted a post-implementation evaluation of genome sequencing (GS) for mitochondrial disease in Australia, which became publicly funded through the Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS) in November 2023, to allow for broader access to testing. Test request data, including demographics, phenotypic information, and the diagnostic outcomes, were collected from November 2023 to May 2025 from the Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, the current laboratory provider of the MBS-funded service. Test uptake was 26% of predicted, with lower test rates in regional and remote areas. Over the first 19 months, 300 individuals suspected of mitochondrial disease underwent GS with a median turnaround time of 84 days (8 days-218 days). The diagnostic yield was 20%, with 56% of diagnoses in known mitochondrial disease genes. Of these, 70% (24 of 34) were in mitochondrial DNA. Seventeen diagnoses were in individuals who had prior non-diagnostic testing (exome sequencing or gene panel). We demonstrate that publicly-funded GS can deliver meaningful diagnostic outcomes for mitochondrial disease on a national scale. To maximise its impact, attention must now shift towards ensuring equitable access, particularly for regional and remote areas, and embedding sustainable mainstreaming models that support both genetic and non-genetic clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.