ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Identification of rectal mucosa-secreted proteins by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the investigation of sexual assault cases with anal penetration.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To aid the criminal investigation of sexual assault with anal penetration, we developed the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to identify Chloride Channel Accessory 1 (CLCA1), a rectal mucosa-secreted protein, in samples collected from foreign objects at the crime scene or from the suspect’s body. The developed procedure was highly specific to samples swabbed from the rectal mucosa and might be sensitive enough to test a trace sample collected from the crime scene. In addition, most of the sexual assault–related contaminants tested in this study showed less influence on the ELISA detection of CLCA1. However, indirect ELISA is likely to be affected by an excessive amount of non-antigen proteins included in other body fluids. In contrast, the multiplex RT-PCR procedure for rectal mucosa markers we previously developed was less sensitive but resistant to the contamination of other forensically relevant body fluids in sexual assault cases. Therefore, both procedures should be selected appropriately or performed in combination, depending on the sample condition, to enable the precise determination of rectal mucosa markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41748915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.