ArticleScientific reports2026
In vitro dietary analysis of tropical browses and pasture consumed by goats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Goat production is rapidly expanding in tropical arid and semi-arid regions, yet limited knowledge exists on the feed they consume. This study investigated the in vitro digestibility, volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile, and methane production of 17 browse and eight forage species consumed by goats in Australia (Experiment 1) and tested interactive effects of forages (Avena sativa and Chloris gayana (Reclaimer)) and browses (Owenia acidula and Eucalyptus coolabah) combined in ratios of 25:75, 50:50, and 75:25, respectively (Experiment 2). Among browses, O. acidula exhibited the most favourable fermentation profile with 53.29% digestibility, 90.64 mL of gas/g dry matter (DM), total VFA concentration of 86.81 mM, 14.41 mL methane/ g digested DM, and an acetate to propionate ratio (A:P) of 1.54. Among the forages, A. sativa demonstrated the greatest digestibility (64.25%), total gas (115.02 mL/g DM), and VFA (114.02 mM), and the lowest methane production (19.90 mL/ g digested DM; P < 0.001). The 75:25 and 50:50 combinations of A. sativa: O. acidula resulted in greater DM digestibility (62.75% and 60.72%) and total gas (99.03 and 98.41 mL/g DM), while reducing methane (10.11 and 11.08 mL/ g digested DM), and A:P (1.91 and 2.17), respectively (P < 0.001) highlighting them as promising candidates for silvopasture systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.