Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748882›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Wear resistance, microhardness and compressive strength of high filled flowable composite resins.

Seyit Bilal Ozdemir, Busra Ozdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seyit Bilal OzdemirDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Giresun University, Giresun, 28200, Turkey. seyitbilalo@gmail.com.
Busra OzdemirDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Giresun University, Giresun, 28200, Turkey.

Funding

Giresun University Scientific Research Projects Unit. SAĞ-BAP-A-290224-46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated microhardness, compressive strength, and wear resistance of seven composite resins: six high-filled flowable and one conventional resin. A total of 140 specimens were prepared from seven composite resins (n = 20). The materials tested included Omnichroma Flow (OCF), Vittra Unique Flow (VUF), Estelite Universal Flow High (EUFH), Medium (EUFM), Superlow (EUFS), Genial Injectable (GUIN), and Filtek Z250 (FZ250). Wear resistance was measured on cylindrical specimens (12 mm × 2 mm ) using a reciprocating tribometer with a Al₂O₃ antagonist, 20 N load, 1 mm stroke, 2.5 mm/s speed, and 1500 cycles. Compressive strength was tested on cylindrical specimens (4 mm × 6 mm) with a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Vickers microhardness was measured on disc specimens (2 mm × 8 mm) with a 100 g load for 10 s. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (p < 0.05) were used for statistical analysis. EUFH, VUF, and OCF had significantly higher wear volumes than FZ250. FZ250 had greater microhardness than all high-filled flowable composites. Although the compressive strength values of the tested high-filled flowable composites were similar to that of the conventional composite resin, variations were observed among the flowable composites themselves. Under the conditions of this in vitro study, high-filled flowable composites showed comparable compressive strength to a conventional composite resin but tended to exhibit higher wear and lower surface hardness, which should be considered when selecting materials for stress-bearing restorations.

Indexed as

CompositesCompressive strengthMicrohardnessWear

Identifiers

PMID41748882
PMCPMC12996458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.