Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748880›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2026

Disentangling coevolutionary constraints for modeling protein conformational heterogeneity.

Shimian Li, Chengwei Zhang, Lupeng Kong, Yue Xue, Sirui Liu, Yi Qin Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shimian LiNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3905-0357
Chengwei ZhangBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lupeng KongChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China.
Yue XueNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Sirui LiuChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China. liusirui@cpl.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-6291
Yi Qin GaoNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China. gaoyq@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-9376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate characterization of multi-state protein conformations is crucial for understanding their functional mechanisms and advancing targeted therapies. Extracting coevolutionary constraints from homologous sequences helps reveal protein structure and function, which can be automatically captured by MSA Transformer leveraging attention mechanisms. Making use of the multi-conformational coevolutionary signals captured by MSA Transformer, we introduce in this study EvoSplit to disentangle coevolutionary signals associated with distinct conformations to guide protein structure predictions. EvoSplit outperforms AF-Cluster on 85 fold-switching proteins and successfully models the conformations of proteins beyond AlphaFold2's training set. We then identify 54 candidates with potential conformational diversity for cancer-related human proteins. Notably, for five GTPases, EvoSplit consistently predicts two conformations, one of which has not been previously reported. As an important example, the protein-protein interaction analysis provides new insights into novel HRAS function-associated conformations. Furthermore, the validity of these newly identified conformations is examined by evolutionary analysis and extensive molecular dynamics simulations.

Identifiers

PMID41748880
PMCPMC13061928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.