ArticleScientific reports2026
Cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index versus triglyceride-glucose-derived indices for predicting 10-year cardiovascular mortality in the MASHAD cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index as a cardiometabolic marker associated with heart rate variability and 1-year cardiovascular rehospitalization in chronic coronary syndromes with comorbid anxiety: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Exploratory mediation analysis of body roundness index in the nonlinear association between CHG index and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease among non-diabetic adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association of the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index with coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with coronary artery disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a major global health challenge, accounting for substantial illness and death worldwide. Growing evidence suggests that insulin resistance (IR) has a substantial role in their development and progression. A recently introduced IR surrogate marker, the Cholesterol-HDL-Glucose (CHG) index, has been suggested as an index for identifying metabolic disturbances, but its value in predicting cardiovascular mortality has not been clearly established. This study set out to examine how well the CHG index predicts cardiovascular mortality when compared with the Triglyceride-Glucose (TyG) index and its variants combined with obesity measures. We analyzed data from middle-aged adults (35–65 years) in the Mashhad Stroke and Heart Atherosclerotic Disorder (MASHAD) cohort study, with data collected from 2011 to 2020. Cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities were tracked over at least 10-year follow-up. The CHG, TyG and its derived substitutes were calculated, and their associations with mortality outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Harrell’s C-index, restricted cubic spline (RCS), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), likelihood-based pseudo-R² and the share of explainable log-likelihood, decision curve analysis (DCA) for clinical utility, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Fine and Grey subdistribution hazard models, E-value for robustness of associations, and subgroup analysis were performed in statistical analysis. Among 7467 participants who were analyzed, higher CHG values were strongly associated with a greater risk of both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Each standard deviation (SD) increase in CHG value, raise the risk of cardiovascular mortality by 35.4%, and 31.9% in competing-risk analysis, which was higher than TyG and its related markers. For all-cause mortality, 1-SD increase in CHG was associated with 21.4% higher risk. In predicting cardiovascular mortality, CHG outperformed TyG and its derivatives on ROC, C-index, IDI, pseudo-R², share of log-likelihood and DCA measures. For all-cause mortality, certain TyG-based indices performed better. RCS modeling indicated a linear relationship between CHG and cardiovascular mortality, and a non-linear relationship with all-cause mortality. Survival analysis, robustness checks, and subgroup analyses supported these findings, with no evidence of effect modification for cardiovascular mortality. Elevated CHG is independently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality and shows a consistent linear pattern. It provides stronger predictive value for cardiovascular death than TyG and its derivatives, supporting its role as a useful marker for assessing CVD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.