ArticleScientific reports2026
Influence of body mass index on perceived lower facial asymmetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial asymmetry plays a crucial role in facial esthetics, and factors such as body mass index may influence its visibility by altering soft tissue thickness, which can lead to differences in how orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople perceive lower facial asymmetry. This discrepancy can affect aesthetic evaluations and treatment expectations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the perceptibility of lower facial asymmetry among individuals with different body mass indices as assessed by orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople. Frontal photographs were obtained from four female models representing different body mass index (BMI) categories, severely underweight (U), normal weight (N), obesity class I (OI), and obesity class III (OIII), ranging from 16.1 to 41.8. All models exhibited symmetrical lower faces. To simulate asymmetry, each image was digitally altered by rotating the chin clockwise by 2°, 4°, and 6°. A web-based survey was created featuring 20 randomly arranged images (five per model). Participants, comprising 97 orthodontists, 86 dentists, and 86 laypeople, rated each image using a 7-point Likert scale (1 = no asymmetry, 7 = maximum asymmetry). Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to evaluate intergroup differences, followed by pairwise comparisons with the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). For models in the U, N, and OI categories, orthodontists and dentists detected minimal deviations of approximately 2.5 mm, whereas laypeople identified deviations of about 3.4 mm or greater. In the OIII category, the threshold for orthodontists increased to 3.41 mm, while neither dentists nor laypeople were able to perceive asymmetry. Body mass index has a significant influence on the perception of lower facial asymmetry. As BMI increases, the perceptibility of lower facial asymmetry decreases. Orthodontists demonstrate greater sensitivity in detecting lower facial deviations compared with dentists and laypeople. Clinically, orthodontists should consider BMI-related changes in soft-tissue balance, as weight variation may influence facial symmetric perception and treatment expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.