Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748851›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

A Proposed Novel Neurovascular Mechanism for Brain Network Dysfunction After Traumatic Injury.

Taotao Wu, Jared A Rifkin, Adam C Rayfield, Keith A Kroma-Wiley, Dani S Bassett, David F Meaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taotao WuDepartmaent of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jared A RifkinDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Adam C RayfieldDepartmaent of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Keith A Kroma-WileyDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Dani S BassettDepartments of Physics & Astronomy, Bioengineering Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
David F MeaneyDepartmaent of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. dmeaney@upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-4122

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group 12347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research in predicting traumatic brain injury risk focuses on the relationship between head impacts and the likelihood of white matter damage, often overlooking the role of neurovascular coupling in the injury response. To fill this gap, we combined biomechanical and neurodynamic principles to simulate alterations to large-scale resting-state brain activity following head impacts. We simulated cortical neural activity with a network of Kuramoto phase oscillators, using structural connectivity to define coupling and a vascular-informed local resource term to capture neurovascular coupling. By combining the neurodynamic model with a brain mechanics model, we investigated two mechanistic pathways of network dysfunction: (1) white matter damage, reflected in degrading network edges, and (2) local tissue oxygenation decline, reflected in adjusting the resource term at each network node. We simulated 53 real-world head impacts using a vasculature template to evaluate the changes in simulated functional connectivity (FC) and neural dynamics relative to injury outcomes (concussion vs. no concussion). To assess vascular variability, simulations were repeated across 41 individual vasculature maps. Our results show simulated FC changes (measured by Pearson's correlation) consistently correlated well with injury outcomes, regardless of injury mechanism (AUC = 0.89 and 0.90), However, the two injury models yielded distinct FC patterns as indicated by graph metrics. Vascular variability substantially influenced how injury affected FC, with some brains exhibiting resilience to synchrony disruption depending on their vascular structure. These findings offer testable insight into the neurovascular mechanism of brain dysfunction after TBI and have important implications for individualized protection and treatment.

Indexed as

BrainBrain Injuries, TraumaticModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeurovascular CouplingHumansFinite element modelFunctional connectivityKuramoto modelNeuromodulationNeurovascular coupling

Identifiers

PMID41748851
PMCPMC13522068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.