SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Timing matters: radiation necrosis risk of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combined with radiation therapy in breast cancer brain metastases: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from male breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain metastases are a significant challenge in advanced breast cancer. While antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), including trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and radiation therapy (RT) are increasingly utilized, concerns exist regarding the heightened risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) when these modalities are combined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the incidence of symptomatic RN following RT with concurrent or sequential ADC therapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases and to identify predictive factors. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science through July 8th, 2025. Studies investigating symptomatic RN in breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated with RT and ADCs were included. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model estimated pooled RN rates and odds ratios (ORs) for different ADC timing strategies (concurrent vs. non-concurrent administration) and comparisons between ADC-recipients and non-ADC control groups. Seven studies encompassing 444 patients with brain metastases were analyzed, of whom 223 (50%) received ADC therapy. The overall pooled symptomatic RN rate in ADC recipients was 20% (95% CI: 12–32%). Compared to radiation therapy alone, ADC administration significantly increased RN risk (OR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.19–6.37; P = 0.018). Treatment timing significantly influenced outcomes: concurrent ADC with RT was associated with higher symptomatic RN odds compared to non-concurrent administration (OR 3.44, 95% CI: 1.39–8.52; P = 0.008). Non-concurrent ADC administration showed no statistically significant increase in symptomatic RN risk versus non-ADC (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 0.23–11.41; P = 0.629). Meta-regression revealed a significant temporal trend, with newer studies reporting lower symptomatic RN rates. Combining ADCs with RT, particularly concurrently, significantly elevates the risk of symptomatic RN in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. These findings necessitate cautious clinical decision-making, potentially favoring sequential administration, and underscore the importance of personalized treatment planning to mitigate neurotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41748827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.