SynthesisNeurocritical care2026
The Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurosurgical Patients: A Single-Center Analysis and Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the outcomes and management considerations associated with using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), including those requiring neurosurgical intervention. It examines the feasibility of managing patients with TBI and neurosurgical patients on ECMO by synthesizing institutional data with the existing literature, emphasizing observed clinical contexts, anticoagulation strategies, and peri-procedural factors relevant to safe ECMO use. Our aim is to elucidate the potential for ECMO to be safely applied in patients with TBI needing intensive cardiopulmonary support, and for neurosurgical intervention to remain an option when indicated.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of seven patients with TBI who received ECMO therapy at our institution. The peri-ECMO period was defined as 7 days before ECMO cannulation to 7 days after decannulation. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare outcomes, complications, and management strategies.
resultsMost patients in our cohort were managed without systemic anticoagulation during ECMO treatment. Five patients underwent neurosurgical procedures in the peri-ECMO period with overall positive outcomes. In the systematic review, outcomes for patients with TBI receiving ECMO varied; while some demonstrated neurological improvement, others succumbed to complications such as septic shock and multiorgan failure. A subset of patients with TBI developed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) while on ECMO, a concern that often discourages its use. They, along with other non-TBI patients who developed ICH while on ECMO, were subsequently treated with neurosurgical interventions with the majority showing functional improvement. Key factors affecting prognosis included ICH size, timing of neurosurgical intervention, and careful adjustment of anticoagulation therapy.
conclusionsThis study highlights that ECMO can be safely utilized in patients with TBI requiring intensive cardiopulmonary support, including those undergoing neurosurgical procedures for ECMO-related complications. In this high-risk population, maintaining ECMO circuits without systemic anticoagulation or with conservative anticoagulation should be considered. Our findings suggest that TBI should not be an absolute contraindication for ECMO therapy, and neurosurgical interventions can be safely performed in these patients, especially when ICH occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.