ArticleScientific reports2026
Design, synthesis, and experimental evaluation of rupestonic acid derivatives as novel anti-tumor agents guided by network pharmacology and molecular docking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This integrated study elucidates the antitumor potential of Artemisia rupestris L.'s primary bioactive component, rupestonic acid (RA), and advances a superior derivative through a systematic, multi-stage strategy. The investigation commenced with network pharmacology, which predicted RA's polypharmacology mechanism by associating it with 55 potential cancer-related targets-including pivotal nodes like the androgen receptor (AR) and protein kinase C eta (PKCη)-and enriched pathways such as PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling. In vitro screening across 30 human cancer cell lines validated this prediction, identifying HCT116 and HepG2 as highly sensitive. To enhance efficacy, a structure-based design yielded 27 novel heterocyclic derivatives. Among these, compound 15 emerged as the optimal candidate, demonstrating potent cytotoxicity with IC₅₀ values of 6.203 µM (HCT116) and 9.955 µM (HepG2), significantly surpassing cisplatin. Molecular docking revealed the structural basis for this activity, showing compound 15's strong binding to key targets like 17β-HSD1 and p38 MAPK via hydrogen bonds and π-π stacking. The stability of these complexes was confirmed through molecular dynamics simulations, which demonstrated convergent RMSD, low binding-site flexibility (RMSF), and sustained favorable interaction energies. Complementing this, a comprehensive in silico ADMET profile established the promising drug-like character of compound 15, predicting high gastrointestinal absorption, no blood-brain barrier permeation, compliance with major drug-likeness rules, and a low toxicity risk. In conclusion, this work from predictive modeling to experimental validation and pharmacokinetic assessment not only deciphers RA's multi-target mechanism but also identifies compound 15 as a stable, absorbable, and potent lead compound, providing a validated foundation for the development of novel natural product-derived anticancer agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.