ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigating synergistic effects in Co-prolysis of groundnut shell and waste tyres on product distribution under different blend ratios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amid the projected depletion of petroleum products and the severe environmental challenges, this study addresses the urgent need for sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels by investigating co-pyrolysis as a means to valorize two different wastes. Groundnut shell and scrap tyres were individually pyrolyzed at 350–600 °C, while co-pyrolysis was conducted at an optimal temperature of 500 °C using tyre blend ratios of 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 80%. Product yields, synergistic effects and properties of bio-oil, char, and gas were systematically evaluated. Individual groundnut shell pyrolysis favored high CO2 and oxygenated liquids with moderate heating value, whereas tyre pyrolysis produced hydrogen- and hydrocarbon-rich gases, carbon-dense char, and high-calorific oil. Co-pyrolysis demonstrated clear synergistic interactions, particularly at 40% tyre blending, yielding improved liquid fuel with higher calorific value, reduced oxygen content, and intermediate density and viscosity compared to the individual feedstocks. Co-pyrolysis char exhibited enhanced fixed carbon and reduced sulphur relative to tyre char alone, while gas fractions showed increased H2 and CH4 with lower CO2 than biomass pyrolysis. These improvements arise from complementary radical interactions and synergistic behavior of volatiles between the feedstocks. The results demonstrate that co-pyrolysis effectively optimizes product quality and energy potential, providing a sustainable pathway for simultaneous waste valorization, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and renewable biofuel production in a circular economy framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.