ArticleScientific reports2026
Unveiling in situ oxygen, carbon and nutrient cycling of a sponge-driven biological hotspot in the arctic.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep-sea sponge grounds are habitat-forming benthic communities characterized by high biomass and structural complexity. Despite their ecological significance, their role for the deep-sea environment remains poorly understood and their functioning is often inferred from ex situ studies. We hypothesized that deep-sea sponge grounds exhibit substantially higher respiration and nutrient turnover than surrounding soft sediments, making them hotspots of carbon and nutrient cycling in the deep sea. Integrated respiration and nutrient cycling were quantified in a sponge ground on the summit of an Arctic seamount (Schulz Bank, ~ 580 m depth). We used in-situ incubation chambers measuring oxygen consumption, prokaryotic cell removal, and inorganic nutrient fluxes. Respiration rates ranged from 0.13 to 0.93 mmol O₂ m⁻² h⁻¹, which is comparable to cold-water coral reefs and up to 7–21 times higher than reported for soft sediments of the Arctic deep sea. This indicates a high organic carbon demand exceeding surface-derived supply, suggesting the uptake of additional food resources. All incubations showed net release of ammonium, phosphate, nitrite and nitrate, with fluxes correlating with sponge biomass. Our results demonstrate that deep-sea sponge grounds function as hotspots of carbon and nutrient cycling and suggest distinct functional contributions of sponge groups and their microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.