Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748712›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A hybrid model for image forgery detection using deep learning with block and keypoint methods.

Fatemeh Zare Mehrjardi, Mohsen Sardari Zarchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh Zare MehrjardiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3268-0114
Mohsen Sardari ZarchiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran. sardari@meybod.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-3426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital images serve as crucial evidence in fields like forensics and medicine, yet their reliability is increasingly threatened by sophisticated forgery techniques such as copy-move. While traditional block-based, keypoint-based, or deep learning approaches exist, each faces challenges regarding geometric transformations, dataset dependency, or computational complexity. This paper presents a novel hybrid model, HDBK, integrating deep learning, block-based, and keypoint-based methods for forgery detection at both image and pixel levels. The proposed framework comprises three fundamental stages. First, a triple-architecture ensemble of deep learning networks identifies forgery images and generates localized heatmaps to highlight suspected regions. Next, an enhanced block-based method utilizing a Genetic Algorithm (GA) is employed. This stage uses the maximum number of matched keypoints between candidate blocks as a fitness function to identify regions similar to the suspected forgery blocks. Finally, keypoint descriptors (SIFT, SURF, and FAST) are applied to match features between the identified regions, achieving precise pixel-level localization. This hybrid approach effectively reduces the search space for optimization, enhancing accuracy while minimizing false positive rates. The HDBK model was rigorously evaluated on the CoMoFoD dataset, which includes forgeries under various geometric transformations and post-processing operations like blurring and JPEG compression. Experimental results demonstrate that the model outperforms state-of-the-art techniques, particularly in detecting challenging scenarios such as small-scale and smooth forgery regions. The synergy between deep feature maps and meta-heuristic optimization ensures a robust balance between computational efficiency and forensic integrity in real-world passive forensic applications.

Indexed as

Block-basedCopy-move forgeryDeep learningDeep neural networkImage level forgery detectionKey point-basedPixel level forgery detection

Identifiers

PMID41748712
PMCPMC13046850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.