ArticleScientific reports2026
Facial landmark-based localization of the parotid duct: a cadaveric study with ultrasonographic feasibility assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The parotid duct (Stensen’s duct) runs superficially across the midface and is often encountered during aesthetic or surgical procedures. Accurate knowledge of its spatial orientation is essential to avoid iatrogenic injury. This study aimed to define the spatial course of the parotid duct relative to facial surface landmarks to demonstrate the feasibility of ultrasonographic identification of these relationships in vivo. Thirty-two hemifaces from sixteen adult cadavers (15 Korean, 1 Caucasian; 9 males, 7 females; mean age 82 years) were dissected to trace the parotid duct from the gland to its penetration through the buccinator. The position of the duct was analyzed relative to (1) the tragus–mouth corner line, (2) the philtrum level (midpoint, upper one-third, or lower one-third), and (3) vertical lines through the canthi. High-resolution ultrasonography was performed in a single healthy volunteer to provide an in vivo feasibility demonstration of the cadaveric findings. At the anterior border of the masseter, the duct was located slightly superior to the tragus–mouth corner line in 84.4% of specimens, on the line in 3.1%, and below it in 12.5%, most of which possessed an accessory parotid gland. Horizontally, the duct aligned with the philtrum midpoint in 65.6%, with the upper one-third in 25.0%, and with the lower one-third in 9.4%. The buccinator penetration point was medial to the vertical line through the lateral canthus in 87.5%. Ultrasonography in a single healthy volunteer visually demonstrated the feasibility of identifying these anatomical relationships in vivo. The parotid duct follows a relatively reproducible course that may be estimated using established facial landmarks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.