ArticleScientific reports2026
Regular outdoor access decreases stress with positive effects on the health of growing pigs raised on a conventional farm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional pig production systems are characterized by fully slatted floors and space restrictions, hindering pigs from foraging and roaming. In contrast, providing pigs with outdoor access allows them to express a wide range of behaviors, but might challenge their health. In this context, we hypothesized that giving pigs regular outdoor access might lower stress exposure with positive impacts for health and welfare. A total of 145 male and 148 female pigs, housed in a conventional barn, were provided (OUT) or not (IN) with access to a grassy paddock twice a week from the age of 77 days to slaughter. The OUT pigs had lower salivary cortisol levels than the IN pigs. Regular access to a pasture also lowered the severity of body lesions. While it had no consequences on animal growth, it was associated with a reduced frequency of diarrhea in pigs. Despite lower leukocytes counts in the OUT pigs compared to the IN ones, higher proportion of the OUT pigs developed humoral response against L. intracellularis. Thus, providing regular access to a paddock for growing pigs had positive impacts on their health and welfare, with no consequence on their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.